If you want to improve your grades fast, use methods proven to work. Decades of cognitive science research have identified the most effective study techniques—and most students are using the wrong ones.
A comprehensive review by Dunlosky et al. (2013) analyzed hundreds of studies to determine which study methods actually improve learning. The results were surprising: many popular techniques like highlighting and re-reading are largely ineffective, while methods like spaced repetition and active recall dramatically improve retention.
The Problem with Traditional Study Methods
Most students default to passive study methods that feel productive but don't actually improve learning:
Ineffective Methods (Low Utility)
- •Re-reading: Creates an illusion of fluency but doesn't improve retention. Research shows re-reading provides minimal benefit beyond the first read (Dunlosky et al., 2013).
- •Highlighting: One of the most popular study methods, yet studies show it has low utility. Students often highlight too much and don't engage deeply with the material (Dunlosky et al., 2013).
- •Cramming: May help you pass an exam, but information is quickly forgotten. Research shows cramming leads to poor long-term retention (Cepeda et al., 2006).
- •Summarization: Only moderately effective and time-consuming. Works better for some students than others (Dunlosky et al., 2013).
The good news? Science has identified much better alternatives. Here are the top evidence-based study methods that actually work.
Top Evidence-Based Study Methods
1. Spaced Repetition
Spaced repetition involves reviewing material at increasing intervals over time. Instead of cramming everything at once, you space out your reviews strategically to maximize long-term retention.
The Research
- • Cepeda et al. (2006) found that spaced practice improves retention by 10-30% compared to massed practice (cramming)
- • A meta-analysis by Cepeda et al. (2009) showed spacing effects across 184 experiments, with retention improvements of up to 200%
- • Rohrer & Pashler (2010) demonstrated that optimal spacing intervals can double long-term retention
How it works: When you review information right before you're about to forget it, you strengthen the memory trace. Each successful review extends the retention interval, eventually making the information permanent.
Example schedule: Review on day 1, then day 2, day 4, day 8, day 16, and so on. The intervals double each time you successfully recall the information.
2. Active Recall (Practice Testing)
Active recall means testing yourself instead of passively re-reading notes. You actively retrieve information from memory, which strengthens neural pathways and improves retention.
The Research
- • Karpicke & Blunt (2011) found that students using active recall scored 50% higher on tests than those who re-read and summarized
- • Roediger & Karpicke (2006) showed that testing yourself creates stronger memory traces than re-reading, even when you get answers wrong
- • Dunlosky et al. (2013) rated practice testing as having "high utility" for improving learning across different conditions and student populations
- • Rowland (2014) conducted a meta-analysis of 118 studies and found consistent benefits of retrieval practice across various materials and testing formats
Why it works: The act of retrieving information from memory is itself a powerful learning event. Each time you successfully recall something, you're strengthening the neural pathway that stores that information.
How to use it: Instead of re-reading your notes, cover them up and try to recall key points. Use flashcards, practice tests, or simply explain concepts out loud without looking at your materials.
3. Interleaving
Interleaving means mixing different topics or types of problems during study sessions, rather than focusing on one topic at a time (blocked practice).
The Research
- • Rohrer, Dedrick & Stershic (2015) found that interleaved practice improved mathematics learning by 25% compared to blocked practice
- • Kornell & Bjork (2008) showed that interleaving helps students better distinguish between similar concepts
- • Taylor & Rohrer (2010) demonstrated that interleaving improves problem-solving and transfer of knowledge to new contexts
- • Birnbaum et al. (2013) found interleaving benefits persist even after delays, showing improved long-term retention
Why it works: When you study one topic at a time, you can rely on short-term memory and context clues. Interleaving forces you to actively discriminate between concepts, which improves understanding and retention.
Example: Instead of studying all biology flashcards, then all chemistry flashcards, mix them together. This helps you learn to distinguish between similar concepts and apply knowledge flexibly.
4. Dual Coding
Dual coding theory suggests that combining verbal and visual information creates two separate memory traces, leading to better retention than using either alone.
The Research
- • Paivio (1986) developed dual coding theory, showing that information processed both verbally and visually is remembered better
- • Mayer & Moreno (2003) found that combining words with images improves learning by 40-50% compared to words alone
- • Sadoski & Paivio (2001) demonstrated that dual coding improves both recall and comprehension across various subjects
- • A meta-analysis by Carney & Levin (2002) showed consistent benefits of combining text with relevant images
How to use it: When studying, combine written notes with diagrams, charts, or mind maps. Draw concepts, create visual representations, and explain ideas using both words and images.
Example: When learning about the Krebs cycle, don't just read the text. Draw the cycle, label each step, and explain it verbally while looking at your diagram.
5. Retrieval Practice
Retrieval practice is the act of recalling information from memory. It's closely related to active recall but emphasizes the practice aspect—regularly testing yourself strengthens memory.
The Research
- • Karpicke & Roediger (2008) found that repeated retrieval practice dramatically improves long-term retention compared to repeated study
- • Roediger & Butler (2011) showed that retrieval practice benefits persist across delays of weeks and months
- • A meta-analysis by Adesope et al. (2017) found retrieval practice improves learning across diverse educational contexts
- • Agarwal et al. (2012) demonstrated that retrieval practice improves both factual knowledge and conceptual understanding
Key insight: The more you practice retrieving information, the easier it becomes to recall it later. This is why flashcards are so effective—they force you to practice retrieval repeatedly.
The Effectiveness Ranking
Based on Dunlosky et al.'s (2013) comprehensive review, here's how study methods rank:
High Utility (Most Effective)
- Practice Testing (Active Recall): High utility across conditions, materials, and student populations
- Distributed Practice (Spaced Repetition): High utility with consistent benefits across learning contexts
Moderate Utility
- Elaborative Interrogation: Moderate utility, works best when students have prior knowledge
- Self-Explanation: Moderate utility, effective for problem-solving and comprehension
- Interleaving: Moderate utility, particularly effective for problem-solving tasks
Low Utility (Less Effective)
- Summarization: Low utility, works better for some students than others
- Highlighting/Underlining: Low utility, minimal benefits
- Rereading: Low utility, provides minimal benefit beyond the first read
Real Results: What the Numbers Show
Average improvement in retention rates with spaced repetition (Cepeda et al., 2006)
Higher test scores with active recall vs. re-reading (Karpicke & Blunt, 2011)
Better learning with interleaving vs. blocked practice (Rohrer et al., 2015)
How to Combine These Methods
The most effective study approach combines multiple evidence-based methods:
The Optimal Study Workflow
- Take notes using dual coding (words + visuals)
- Create flashcards for active recall practice
- Use spaced repetition to schedule reviews at optimal intervals
- Interleave topics by mixing different subjects in study sessions
- Practice retrieval regularly through self-testing
This combination leverages the strengths of each method and creates a comprehensive learning system that maximizes retention and understanding.
How AI Helps Automate These Methods
While these methods are highly effective, they can be time-consuming to implement manually. This is where AI-powered study tools like NoteFren make a difference:
Automated Flashcard Creation
AI analyzes your notes and automatically creates flashcards optimized for active recall. What used to take hours now takes minutes.
- • Identifies key concepts automatically
- • Creates question-answer pairs
- • Organizes by topic
Smart Spaced Repetition
AI algorithms calculate optimal review intervals based on your performance, ensuring you review material at the perfect time for maximum retention.
- • SM-2 algorithm optimization
- • Personalized intervals
- • Automatic scheduling
Intelligent Summaries
AI creates concise summaries that highlight key concepts, helping you understand the big picture before diving into details.
- • Extracts main ideas
- • Preserves relationships
- • Multiple detail levels
Adaptive Study Planning
AI helps you interleave topics effectively and creates study plans that optimize your learning schedule based on your goals and deadlines.
- • Topic mixing suggestions
- • Optimal study schedules
- • Progress tracking
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- 1.Passive re-reading: Re-reading notes feels productive but provides minimal learning benefit. Switch to active recall instead.
- 2.Cramming: While it might help you pass an exam, information learned through cramming is quickly forgotten. Use spaced repetition for long-term retention.
- 3.Blocked practice: Studying one topic at a time feels easier but is less effective. Interleave different topics to improve discrimination and retention.
- 4.Over-highlighting: Highlighting everything defeats the purpose. Use highlighting sparingly and combine it with active recall.
- 5.Ignoring feedback: Testing yourself is only effective if you learn from mistakes. Review incorrect answers and understand why you got them wrong.
Getting Started: Your Action Plan
Ready to transform your study habits? Here's how to implement these methods:
- Start with active recall: Replace re-reading with self-testing. Create flashcards or cover your notes and try to recall key points.
- Implement spaced repetition: Review material at increasing intervals. Use an app or calendar to schedule reviews.
- Mix your topics: Instead of studying one subject at a time, alternate between different topics in a single session.
- Combine words and visuals: Add diagrams, charts, or drawings to your notes to leverage dual coding.
- Practice regularly: Make retrieval practice a daily habit, even if it's just 10-15 minutes.
- Track your progress: Monitor what works for you and adjust your approach based on results.
The Bottom Line
The research is clear: not all study methods are created equal. Methods like spaced repetition, active recall, and interleaving are backed by decades of cognitive science research and consistently outperform traditional approaches like re-reading and highlighting.
The challenge is that implementing these methods manually can be time-consuming. That's where AI-powered study tools like NoteFren come in—they automate the most effective study techniques, so you can focus on learning instead of preparing to learn.
By combining evidence-based methods with AI automation, you can study more effectively, retain more information, and improve your grades—all while spending less time on busywork.
👉 Put these science-backed methods into practice with NoteFren. Automate flashcards, spaced repetition, and study planning—all in one app.
References
- Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests: A meta-analysis of practice testing. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659-701.
- Agarwal, P. K., Bain, P. M., & Chamberlain, R. W. (2012). The value of applied research: Retrieval practice improves classroom learning and recommendations from a teacher, a principal, and a scientist. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 437-448.
- Birnbaum, M. S., Kornell, N., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). Why interleaving enhances inductive learning: The roles of discrimination and retrieval. Memory & Cognition, 41(3), 392-402.
- Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5-26.
- Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380.
- Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2009). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1095-1102.
- Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.
- Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772-775.
- Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319(5865), 966-968.
- Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the 'enemy of induction'? Psychological Science, 19(6), 585-592.
- Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
- Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
- Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20-27.
- Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255.
- Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R. F., & Stershic, S. (2015). Interleaved practice improves mathematics learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 900-908.
- Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010). Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher, 39(5), 406-412.
- Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432-1463.
- Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010). The effects of interleaved practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 837-848.